PIERS Morgan has threatened to “storm back into GMB” after Ofcom cleared his comments about Meghan Markle’s mental health.
The former TV host, who quit Good Morning Britain after storming out in March, celebrated the ruling from the broadcasting regulator on Wednesday.
4
Piers, 56, had found himself in hot water over his public dismissal of the Duchess of Sussex’s mental health claims back in March.
He was investigated by Ofcom over a possible breach of the broadcasting code, but it was ruled he WAS entitled to give his divisive opinion on air.
Now with his name cleared, the TV presenter has threatened to make a comeback to the popular news show in an explosive tweet.
“Maybe I should just storm back in,” Piers wrote, retweeting an article detailing how ITV had ‘ruled out his return’ to Good Morning Britain.
Fans went wild while replying to the tweet, pleading with him to return alongside Susanna Reid and telling Piers how much they had “missed him”.
However, sources have suggested that Piers will NOT be making a comeback to GMB, with co-host Susanna confirming he won’t be back.
Confirming that Piers wouldn’t be returning to the job, Susanna said this morning: “He tweeted ‘does this mean I get my job back,’ but ITV effectively said he’s not coming back.
“He’s been inundated with offers, particularly after yesterday, so I’m sure he’s got plenty of things to consider.
“We don’t have Piers on the programme this morning, not because of a restriction on freedom of speech.
“We do have his better half, Celia Walden and she has written an absolutely terrific book about a ruthless man in the workplace with whom his colleagues have a love-hate relationship.”
Piers stormed off the show after accusing Meghan of lying to Oprah Winfrey when she said she had previously felt suicidal.
Meghan, 40, and Harry, 36, personally lodged a complaint against Piers to ITV and Ofcom about his outburst.
But yesterday the media watchdog declared Piers was within his rights to share his thoughts on TV.
The regulator said he was “entitled” to say he didn’t believe the Sussexes’ claims, and restricting his strong views would be an “unwarranted and chilling restriction on freedom of expression”.
Immediately after the verdict, Piers shared his delight on Twitter – even jokingly asking for his job back.
He posted: “I’m delighted Ofcom has endorsed my right to disbelieve the Duke & Duchess of Sussex’s incendiary claims to Oprah Winfrey, many of which have proven to be untrue.
“This is a resounding victory for free speech and a resounding defeat for Princess Pinocchios [sic]. Do I get my job back?”
Piers’ rant about Meghan’s televised interview with Oprah saw record numbers of Ofcom complaints, with more than 57,000 were lodged against him – the highest number in a decade.
This was more than double the number received in response to Diversity’s Black Lives Matter performance on Britain’s Got Talent in October last year – the most complained about TV moment of 2020.
Ofcom launched an investigation into the GMB episode a short time later under “harm and offence rules.”
It looked into Piers’ dismissive comments about Meghan’s claims to have had issues with her mental health during the show and even claimed he didn’t believe she was left feeling suicidal.
It comes as…
- Piers Morgan hails ‘watershed moment’ for free speech over Meghan Markle GMB row & insists: ‘I still don’t believe her’
- Susanna Reid reveals she feels ‘slightly awkward’ stuck between Piers Morgan and ITV bosses after Ofcom stand-off
- The presenter brands Meghan a ‘whiny fork-tongued actress’ and ‘demonstrable liar’ after Ofcom win
- Piers asks ‘Do I get my job back?’ over ‘Princess Pinocchio’ Meghan Markle’s ‘chilling’ attack on free speech
- Meghan will be ‘absolutely livid’ as Piers wins Ofcom ruling over ‘liar’ blast and ‘will speak to lawyers’
- Piers’ ex-GMB colleague Susanna Reid breaks her silence on his Ofcom win over Meghan
In the interview, Meghan told how life as a royal became unbearable and she “didn’t want to be alive anymore”.
The Duchess of Sussex said she begged for help but was told she would not be able to seek help as it “wouldn’t be good for the institution”.
But Piers had no sympathy for the then-pregnant royal and ranted on the ITV breakfast show: “Who did you go to? What did they say to you?
“I don’t believe a word she says, Meghan Markle. I wouldn’t believe a weather report if she read it.
“The fact she has expressed an onslaught against our Royal Family is contemptible.”
The day after he made the comments – Piers announced he wouldn’t be returning to the show following his colleague Alex Beresford’s monologue criticising him for continually attacking Meghan.
‘FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION’
A statement released by Ofcom yesterday said: “This interview became a major international news story and we acknowledged it was both legitimate and in the public interest for ITV to broadcast debates featuring presenters such as Mr Morgan scrutinising those allegations including the veracity, timing and possible motivations of the claims.
“Consistent with the right to freedom of expression, broadcasters can portray strong views on the matter, including views casting doubt on the claims made.
“Ofcom is clear that, consistent with freedom of expression, Mr Morgan was entitled to say he disbelieved the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s allegations and to hold and express strong views that rigorously challenged their account.
“The Code allows for individuals to express strongly held and robustly argued views, including those that are potentially harmful or highly offensive, and for broadcasters to include these in their programming.
“The restriction of such views would, in our view, be an unwarranted and chilling restriction on freedom of expression both of the broadcaster and audience.”
An Ofcom spokesperson added: “This was a finely-balanced decision. Mr Morgan’s comments were potentially harmful and offensive to viewers, and we recognise the strong public reaction to them.
“But we also took full account of freedom of expression.
“Under our rules, broadcasters can include controversial opinions as part of legitimate debate in the public interest, and the strong challenge to Mr Morgan from other contributors provided important context for viewers.
“Nonetheless, we’ve reminded ITV to take greater care around content discussing mental health and suicide in future.
“ITV might consider the use of timely warnings or signposting of support services to ensure viewers are properly protected.”
4
4